Acceleration

Toyota’s subcompact cross over is powered by a 144-horsepower 2.0-liter lookup engine that’s mated to a continuously variable automatic transmission. Overall, it’s weak, and it gets noisy when awakened.

The Honda gets its power from a 141-horsepower 1.8-liter four-cylinder. Much like the powertrain from the C-HR vs. HR-V, it is unimpressive. However, the HRV is a much milder vehicle, and its engine can be more straightforward, performs satisfactorily once it’s up to rate, and has a retuned-for-2019 continuously variable automatic transmission. The upgraded transmission works to help the SUV correct rpms in some specific driving situations, such as tackling hilly locations.

C-HR vs. HR-V
source: practicalmotoring.com.au

Fuel Economy

However, the Honda HR V fares better. Even in the event, you incorporate all-wheel drive to the Honda, and it still matches the CHR’s fuel economy estimates.

Ride and Handling

The CHR handles well and exhibits almost no body lean around corners. Furthermore, it provides responsive steering and a smooth ride.

The HR V also supplies a coddling ride along with well-weighted and sharp steering. It’s simple to move in tight spots, and its handling is possibly more dynamic than that of all subcompact SUVs, for example, C HR.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *